Long live Italy, long live the Republican Constitution was born from the anti-fascist resistance and flourished from the ideals of the Risorgimento.
Thursday, March 17, 2011
Watch Free Movies Online Spanish
FREEDOM, 'BROTHERHOOD', EQUALITY! On occasion
Long live Italy, long live the Republican Constitution was born from the anti-fascist resistance and flourished from the ideals of the Risorgimento.
Long live Italy, long live the Republican Constitution was born from the anti-fascist resistance and flourished from the ideals of the Risorgimento.
Wednesday, March 16, 2011
Pain Shooting Down Thumb To Wrist
E 'BENE Speak out! THE CONFUSION OF THE GAME
The City of Vicenza and the Ecumenical Center Eugenius IV organized for Sunday, March 20, 2011 in the new municipal theater citizen VII inter-religious meeting on "Who is God to you?". Initiative were invited Sikhs, Hindus, Muslims and Christians, of course.
I received a free ticket to the staff entrance to the theater and since, by temperament and conviction have always been used to justify my actions, I must explain why, while thanking, I will not accept the invitation.
I - falls into These days, the 150th anniversary of the unification of Italy that, in institutional settings in which it was celebrated, not to become a manifestation of generic rhetoric of patriotism and good feeling empty content was presented as an opportunity to mobilize the Italian people around the values \u200b\u200bof the republican constitution formed by anti fascist resistance and logical conclusion of that great process of national liberation was the Italian Risorgimento. If the mayor of Vicenza and his council wanted to give life to an initiative by promoting the encounter between the religions of the "new Italians" was an obvious reference to those articles of the Constitution relating to aliens, as beings certain inviolable human rights are recognized, was exemplary initiative in which Sikh, Hindu, Muslim and Christians outside the Roman Catholic Church could represent the extreme hardship that together substantial feel in the face of Article 19 of the Constitution inapplicable "Everyone has the right to profess freely their religion, on an individual associated in the public and private, to have the necessary places of worship provided they are not contrary to public morality. I believe that this initiative would have been much appreciated by their Creator with an event that, at best, vaguely folk will be an occasion to another to exhibit in public his "ecumenical vocation."
II - An initiative to defend the most important human rights, religious freedom, which is the highest manifestation of the freedom of thought, would have been much more necessary for a general exchange of views on the idea that each has of God, especially when one considers that the issue of religious freedom no political force in Italy demonstrates the commitment no matter how small, while in fact a subversive and anti-national force like the Northern League for the Independence of Padania does not lack for opportunity to take its representatives institutions, regional advisers to the mayors efforts to prevent the exercise of that freedom in the name of "Judeo-Christian roots" of Italy. Concerning in particular the Muslims could do a long list of violations of the freedom registratesi in the province of Vicenza, and also in the capital: starting with the fact that one is forced to hide the identity of places of worship (which in Islam is mosques called) under the label of cultural center, an association of social initiative and the like, not to mention the systematic hammering on some local press that is dedicated to vilify, to falsify, and in the worst way to present the contents of the Islamic faith and the characteristics anthropology of one who professes.
III - Why is the mayor of Vicenza who also said in an interview he did not know the Islamic community Vicenza to defer indefinitely the uncertainty surrounding the feasibility of a non-Catholic cemetery to bury the corpses of those who were not Catholic, and that so far has never deigned to have a meeting to be Courtesy also with representatives of the Muslim community (about 7000 people in the city), it is promoting an initiative on the following title: "Muslim, Sikh, Hindu, Orthodox and Protestant Christians, Jehovah's Witnesses, Evangelicals: meeting undertake an initiative to protect religious freedom for all "? Such an initiative would be much richer in spirit of ecumenical and inter religious unnecessary disquisition on the nature of "anthropological" of differences and, above all, it would really contribute to that integration of immigrants into Italian society, giving the character the only differences that can assimilate: the full enjoyment of rights enshrined in the Constitution.
I know that all too many hypocrites in our country, and call themselves Christians forget that Jesus, blessed be his name, he used the strongest words against the hypocrites, they will respond with the usual threadbare argument that in countries of the Islamic religion Freedom of worship is not granted to religions other than Islam. Apart from the groundless and pretext argument, contradicted by many Christian churches exist in the world where Islam is professed, we would ask this group of hypocrites what should be done taking into account that in Italy most of the U.S. force in the death penalty should be reintroduced, perhaps against citizens American convicted in our country? In other words: flattened at the positions of those who practice barbarism. I have received recent information from China and the terrible country where human rights are denied, there is a capital named Beijing where there are Buddhist pagodas, Hindu temples, Muslim mosques, Catholic churches and Christians in general. And what of the tremendous Ayatollah of Iran, where Christians are quietly allowed to grow vines for the wine extract use in the Eucharist even though it is an alcoholic beverage is prohibited by Islam? They know the League crypto Nazi (sometimes confess) who sit third in the Iranian parliament members of the Jewish religion guaranteed by the Constitution? And you know, always the League that in most work places of the Muslim countries Christians are granted permission on the job to attend Sunday Mass? I can shorten a conference sponsored by the democratic institutions and political forces in Vicenza: "Against Hypocrisy!" 
The City of Vicenza and the Ecumenical Center Eugenius IV organized for Sunday, March 20, 2011 in the new municipal theater citizen VII inter-religious meeting on "Who is God to you?". Initiative were invited Sikhs, Hindus, Muslims and Christians, of course.
I received a free ticket to the staff entrance to the theater and since, by temperament and conviction have always been used to justify my actions, I must explain why, while thanking, I will not accept the invitation.
I - falls into These days, the 150th anniversary of the unification of Italy that, in institutional settings in which it was celebrated, not to become a manifestation of generic rhetoric of patriotism and good feeling empty content was presented as an opportunity to mobilize the Italian people around the values \u200b\u200bof the republican constitution formed by anti fascist resistance and logical conclusion of that great process of national liberation was the Italian Risorgimento. If the mayor of Vicenza and his council wanted to give life to an initiative by promoting the encounter between the religions of the "new Italians" was an obvious reference to those articles of the Constitution relating to aliens, as beings certain inviolable human rights are recognized, was exemplary initiative in which Sikh, Hindu, Muslim and Christians outside the Roman Catholic Church could represent the extreme hardship that together substantial feel in the face of Article 19 of the Constitution inapplicable "Everyone has the right to profess freely their religion, on an individual associated in the public and private, to have the necessary places of worship provided they are not contrary to public morality. I believe that this initiative would have been much appreciated by their Creator with an event that, at best, vaguely folk will be an occasion to another to exhibit in public his "ecumenical vocation."
II - An initiative to defend the most important human rights, religious freedom, which is the highest manifestation of the freedom of thought, would have been much more necessary for a general exchange of views on the idea that each has of God, especially when one considers that the issue of religious freedom no political force in Italy demonstrates the commitment no matter how small, while in fact a subversive and anti-national force like the Northern League for the Independence of Padania does not lack for opportunity to take its representatives institutions, regional advisers to the mayors efforts to prevent the exercise of that freedom in the name of "Judeo-Christian roots" of Italy. Concerning in particular the Muslims could do a long list of violations of the freedom registratesi in the province of Vicenza, and also in the capital: starting with the fact that one is forced to hide the identity of places of worship (which in Islam is mosques called) under the label of cultural center, an association of social initiative and the like, not to mention the systematic hammering on some local press that is dedicated to vilify, to falsify, and in the worst way to present the contents of the Islamic faith and the characteristics anthropology of one who professes.
III - Why is the mayor of Vicenza who also said in an interview he did not know the Islamic community Vicenza to defer indefinitely the uncertainty surrounding the feasibility of a non-Catholic cemetery to bury the corpses of those who were not Catholic, and that so far has never deigned to have a meeting to be Courtesy also with representatives of the Muslim community (about 7000 people in the city), it is promoting an initiative on the following title: "Muslim, Sikh, Hindu, Orthodox and Protestant Christians, Jehovah's Witnesses, Evangelicals: meeting undertake an initiative to protect religious freedom for all "? Such an initiative would be much richer in spirit of ecumenical and inter religious unnecessary disquisition on the nature of "anthropological" of differences and, above all, it would really contribute to that integration of immigrants into Italian society, giving the character the only differences that can assimilate: the full enjoyment of rights enshrined in the Constitution.
I know that all too many hypocrites in our country, and call themselves Christians forget that Jesus, blessed be his name, he used the strongest words against the hypocrites, they will respond with the usual threadbare argument that in countries of the Islamic religion Freedom of worship is not granted to religions other than Islam. Apart from the groundless and pretext argument, contradicted by many Christian churches exist in the world where Islam is professed, we would ask this group of hypocrites what should be done taking into account that in Italy most of the U.S. force in the death penalty should be reintroduced, perhaps against citizens American convicted in our country? In other words: flattened at the positions of those who practice barbarism. I have received recent information from China and the terrible country where human rights are denied, there is a capital named Beijing where there are Buddhist pagodas, Hindu temples, Muslim mosques, Catholic churches and Christians in general. And what of the tremendous Ayatollah of Iran, where Christians are quietly allowed to grow vines for the wine extract use in the Eucharist even though it is an alcoholic beverage is prohibited by Islam? They know the League crypto Nazi (sometimes confess) who sit third in the Iranian parliament members of the Jewish religion guaranteed by the Constitution? And you know, always the League that in most work places of the Muslim countries Christians are granted permission on the job to attend Sunday Mass? I can shorten a conference sponsored by the democratic institutions and political forces in Vicenza: "Against Hypocrisy!"
Monday, March 14, 2011
My Whole Body Feels Ichey
WESTERN with Gaddafi
article Renzo Guolo, The Independent 14/03/2011
article Renzo Guolo, The Independent 14/03/2011
Gaddafi recapture the city of oil and preparing the final battle of Benghazi. The Anabasis of the rebels may soon come to fruition if you do not receive outside support. N
very worrying results: the victory of the Colonel would have significant consequences not only on the fate of the insurgents but also on the remaining western credibility. The story Libyan treatment other than those of Tunisia and Egypt, both domestically and outside. Not only because the center-periphery conflict and the intra-tribal roots undermine the potential of new social actors, such as young, emerging aTunisi and Cairo, for identification of subjects related to traditional clan or territorial. The Egyptian members age is more differentiated than the Libyan easier concat with flattery, threats, promises. "LafamigliaGhedda-fi is Libya," said the Colonel, and in this statement, imbued with an unparalleled will to power, there is a paradox of truth: after forty years of personal regime, its influence is much more extensive than was that of her neighbors set down. Libya is also less susceptible to outside pressure of the other two North African countries. In this context, Gaddafi has realized that he could play the card of resistance, relying on the time factor, the uncertainties Western, those Arab regimes fearful of the precedent, as well as the convergence of Moscow and Beijing aPalazzo diVetro. What is surprising is not the choice as that of Colonel, helpless, the West, the first rushing enthusiastically to support the insurgents, then to recognize them as the rising power, finally, abandoned to their fate made. Let me be clear: a military intervention, including the claimed "no fly zone" of operation, however the nature of war, is fraught with unknowns. But is it possible, after having gone that far, even the judicial level, turn a blind eye, simply call for the precise conditions and policies in the meantime see the satrap parade on horseback in Benghazi? Possible, after Obama ordered him to leave and Sarkozy has proposed to bomb his bunker? Certainly not: Ghedaffi is destined to become, once again, a pariah of the international community. Even if someone keeps looking at him as a lesser evil and cultivate the idea that he can continue to ensure oil flows and act as a breakwater to the masses of migrants. To remain reticent little hesitant to Italian, you can imagine that after the hereafter, you can restore the treaty between Italy and Libya "outstanding in practice"? And maybe resume joint patrols at sea in search of desperate? If Ghedaffi remain in power inevitably would look to Russia and China, respectively, decided to regain a place in the sun in the Mediterranean and meet the growing greed for oil. A resignation would immobility, however, vanish the credit earned in the Islamic world from America to Obama. The opposition in the Gulf, not just Iran but also Saudi, they would have more hope. Water for the mill of the radical Islamist declining thesis on "natural" and "inevitable" American support for the "wicked schemes."
a tragic dilemma, one that faces the West, where you play not only Lasorte the Colonel but also the forces that are fighting for democracy Crescent. In any case, a dilemma that must be dissolved immediately: time is running out now. If the rais
able to tame the insurgency and to remain in power, what will be the attitude of the U.S. and Europe?
The title of the article we just mentioned should be radically correct. We propose that a better photographer, the role that the so-called West, on the other in good company, played in the comparison mostly "played" with Colonel Gaddafi, now seems poised to an easy victory over the armed youths for more than just and have more courage to show the world that they are fed up with a clown dictator armed with a well-experienced bloody ferocity and a megalomaniac who has had more to the shortness to have an arsenal of modern and efficient.
course it is possible to rank among the different degrees of cowardly opportunism, in the face of substantial indifference to the fate of a democratic revolution from below game, and finally between the various manifestations of cialtroneria braggart.
I - The negative record as it is usual to Berlusconi and his court. Perhaps because it has certainly not forgotten the kiss-hand that was lavished with the Libyan Colonel, Berlusconi began after saying he had phoned in the early days of the uprising in Libya, saying that his partner "did not want to disturb him," he said mandating his dapper Foreign Minister (and soon we will see him in some fashion male) that had to be avoided interference of internal affairs of a sovereign state, the same Frattini also invented the strange theory that Italy "recognizes the states but not governments "to respond negatively to the proposals of those in Europe called for the recognition of the Provisional Government Benghazi; still Frattini, having called for the establishment of an "off-line zone" to stop the Libyan air force to shoot ba shccessivamente confirmed the danger of such a choice. The only concern was that the Northern League minister Maroni has been to emphasize repeatedly that Gaddafi would have meant the fall of the African invasion of Italy: in essence, the charitable interior minister is a dictator who works better nell'affondare boats full of desperate people rather than reinforce a process of democratic renewal in North Africa. Berlusconi has completed its esploits implying that responsibility for the failure of the removal from power of Gaddafi was one of those judges of the Hague Tribunal have identified that the massacres carried out by his partner "crimes against humanity" legitimately prosecuted. "Berlusconi is set: the fault is always of the judges. The frame of this picture has not uplifting story of Italian aid : fourth parties in trumpeting the creation of a "field Italy" that could accommodate at least 50,000 refugees massed on the border with Tunisia, it was folded in four tents to accommodate the logistics of the rescuer. A senior Tunisian commented: "A great country like Italy is a lot of stories for the 5000 people that have landed on Lampedusa in 20 days, and we Tunisians, full of problems, and poor Affan, we have nourished and provided tents during the same period of no less than 60 000 people.
II - French President Sarkozy, after being the last to download the Tunisian dictator Ben Ali and the Egyptian pharaoh Mubarak against Gaddafi has shouldered one of the swords of the 3 Musketeers and proclaimed, "bomb the positions of Gaddafi alone even without UN authorization. " Of course, it was careful not to do so despite the British prime minister has pretended to want to follow.
III - "Gaddafi must go!" he repeated a dozen times Barack Obama President of the USA. "Gaddafi must go!" echoed Hillary Clinton, U.S. Secretary of State. Who knows maybe some of the CIA strategist possessed some special quality of salt "to be put on the tail of the sparrow Libya." The fact is that the U.S. did not lift a finger using a screen as the likely opposition of the Arab League and Russia. Then the Arab League has ruled unanimously in favor of the "No Fly Zone" on Libya, while Vladimir Putin has solemnly proclaimed that Gaddafi must be expelled from the international political scene.
While all the above listed continuing to chatter chatter, Qaddafi continued his bombardment with modern aircraft, heavy artillery and a large amount of tanks. The rebels, four armed young men in the substance of their courage and their desire for freedom, are forced to back. Very
Italian newspapers, an old national habit, not too secretly cheering for the brilliant counter-attack of the colonel. They are unaware that some level of infamy, sooner or later you pay before history.
very worrying results: the victory of the Colonel would have significant consequences not only on the fate of the insurgents but also on the remaining western credibility. The story Libyan treatment other than those of Tunisia and Egypt, both domestically and outside. Not only because the center-periphery conflict and the intra-tribal roots undermine the potential of new social actors, such as young, emerging aTunisi and Cairo, for identification of subjects related to traditional clan or territorial. The Egyptian members age is more differentiated than the Libyan easier concat with flattery, threats, promises. "LafamigliaGhedda-fi is Libya," said the Colonel, and in this statement, imbued with an unparalleled will to power, there is a paradox of truth: after forty years of personal regime, its influence is much more extensive than was that of her neighbors set down. Libya is also less susceptible to outside pressure of the other two North African countries. In this context, Gaddafi has realized that he could play the card of resistance, relying on the time factor, the uncertainties Western, those Arab regimes fearful of the precedent, as well as the convergence of Moscow and Beijing aPalazzo diVetro. What is surprising is not the choice as that of Colonel, helpless, the West, the first rushing enthusiastically to support the insurgents, then to recognize them as the rising power, finally, abandoned to their fate made. Let me be clear: a military intervention, including the claimed "no fly zone" of operation, however the nature of war, is fraught with unknowns. But is it possible, after having gone that far, even the judicial level, turn a blind eye, simply call for the precise conditions and policies in the meantime see the satrap parade on horseback in Benghazi? Possible, after Obama ordered him to leave and Sarkozy has proposed to bomb his bunker? Certainly not: Ghedaffi is destined to become, once again, a pariah of the international community. Even if someone keeps looking at him as a lesser evil and cultivate the idea that he can continue to ensure oil flows and act as a breakwater to the masses of migrants. To remain reticent little hesitant to Italian, you can imagine that after the hereafter, you can restore the treaty between Italy and Libya "outstanding in practice"? And maybe resume joint patrols at sea in search of desperate? If Ghedaffi remain in power inevitably would look to Russia and China, respectively, decided to regain a place in the sun in the Mediterranean and meet the growing greed for oil. A resignation would immobility, however, vanish the credit earned in the Islamic world from America to Obama. The opposition in the Gulf, not just Iran but also Saudi, they would have more hope. Water for the mill of the radical Islamist declining thesis on "natural" and "inevitable" American support for the "wicked schemes."
a tragic dilemma, one that faces the West, where you play not only Lasorte the Colonel but also the forces that are fighting for democracy Crescent. In any case, a dilemma that must be dissolved immediately: time is running out now. If the rais
able to tame the insurgency and to remain in power, what will be the attitude of the U.S. and Europe?
The title of the article we just mentioned should be radically correct. We propose that a better photographer, the role that the so-called West, on the other in good company, played in the comparison mostly "played" with Colonel Gaddafi, now seems poised to an easy victory over the armed youths for more than just and have more courage to show the world that they are fed up with a clown dictator armed with a well-experienced bloody ferocity and a megalomaniac who has had more to the shortness to have an arsenal of modern and efficient.
course it is possible to rank among the different degrees of cowardly opportunism, in the face of substantial indifference to the fate of a democratic revolution from below game, and finally between the various manifestations of cialtroneria braggart.
I - The negative record as it is usual to Berlusconi and his court. Perhaps because it has certainly not forgotten the kiss-hand that was lavished with the Libyan Colonel, Berlusconi began after saying he had phoned in the early days of the uprising in Libya, saying that his partner "did not want to disturb him," he said mandating his dapper Foreign Minister (and soon we will see him in some fashion male) that had to be avoided interference of internal affairs of a sovereign state, the same Frattini also invented the strange theory that Italy "recognizes the states but not governments "to respond negatively to the proposals of those in Europe called for the recognition of the Provisional Government Benghazi; still Frattini, having called for the establishment of an "off-line zone" to stop the Libyan air force to shoot ba shccessivamente confirmed the danger of such a choice. The only concern was that the Northern League minister Maroni has been to emphasize repeatedly that Gaddafi would have meant the fall of the African invasion of Italy: in essence, the charitable interior minister is a dictator who works better nell'affondare boats full of desperate people rather than reinforce a process of democratic renewal in North Africa. Berlusconi has completed its esploits implying that responsibility for the failure of the removal from power of Gaddafi was one of those judges of the Hague Tribunal have identified that the massacres carried out by his partner "crimes against humanity" legitimately prosecuted. "Berlusconi is set: the fault is always of the judges. The frame of this picture has not uplifting story of Italian aid : fourth parties in trumpeting the creation of a "field Italy" that could accommodate at least 50,000 refugees massed on the border with Tunisia, it was folded in four tents to accommodate the logistics of the rescuer. A senior Tunisian commented: "A great country like Italy is a lot of stories for the 5000 people that have landed on Lampedusa in 20 days, and we Tunisians, full of problems, and poor Affan, we have nourished and provided tents during the same period of no less than 60 000 people.
II - French President Sarkozy, after being the last to download the Tunisian dictator Ben Ali and the Egyptian pharaoh Mubarak against Gaddafi has shouldered one of the swords of the 3 Musketeers and proclaimed, "bomb the positions of Gaddafi alone even without UN authorization. " Of course, it was careful not to do so despite the British prime minister has pretended to want to follow.
III - "Gaddafi must go!" he repeated a dozen times Barack Obama President of the USA. "Gaddafi must go!" echoed Hillary Clinton, U.S. Secretary of State. Who knows maybe some of the CIA strategist possessed some special quality of salt "to be put on the tail of the sparrow Libya." The fact is that the U.S. did not lift a finger using a screen as the likely opposition of the Arab League and Russia. Then the Arab League has ruled unanimously in favor of the "No Fly Zone" on Libya, while Vladimir Putin has solemnly proclaimed that Gaddafi must be expelled from the international political scene.
While all the above listed continuing to chatter chatter, Qaddafi continued his bombardment with modern aircraft, heavy artillery and a large amount of tanks. The rebels, four armed young men in the substance of their courage and their desire for freedom, are forced to back. Very
Italian newspapers, an old national habit, not too secretly cheering for the brilliant counter-attack of the colonel. They are unaware that some level of infamy, sooner or later you pay before history.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)