Monday, February 28, 2011
Sunday, February 27, 2011
Where Can I Watch Black Bible Gaiden
IN THE NAME OF GOD CLEMENTE MERCIFUL AND ...
In his latest weekly column published in The Republic of Sunday, February 27, 2011, Eugenio Scalfari writes: "The revolutions of the peoples of North African and Middle Eastern countries have many differences between them but also many similarities. Among these there are three that are worth mentioning: they are led by young people, have as primary objective the conquest of rights and freedoms and secular revolution in Muslim countries even if their cry for recognition and victory is often the traditional "Allah is Great "." Normally
Scalfari is one of the Italian journalists who wrote one of those things more interesting and more often shared, but it can happen to him to write things rough and substantially inaccurate, especially when facing the reality that evil does not know or know through the usual prism of prejudices euro-centric and pro-Western. Therefore I will endeavor to Italian Muslim who built his own culture to drink at the same sources which, with almost certainty, drank Eugenio Scalfari, (the French Enlightenment and especially Voltaire and Monteschieu and Diderop; the English philosophy of the first 700 ' and in particular John Locke, I think Manuel Kant) but then had the good fortune to jump into that big ocean that is the Koran, to highlight what are the main "inaccuracies" in his article: In his latest weekly column published in The Republic of Sunday, February 27, 2011, Eugenio Scalfari writes: "The revolutions of the peoples of North African and Middle Eastern countries have many differences between them but also many similarities. Among these there are three that are worth mentioning: they are led by young people, have as primary objective the conquest of rights and freedoms and secular revolution in Muslim countries even if their cry for recognition and victory is often the traditional "Allah is Great "." Normally
1 - The cry of victory and the battle of young Muslims who have fearlessly faced the bullets and bombs of the tyrants who, for the oil and the myopia of many Western governments were imposed on Arab people, not "God is Great" ("Allah-U-El-Kabir") but is "God is the Greatest" ("Allah-u-Akbar). The presence of God in speeches and in exclamations, in greetings and prayers of Muslims is a fact of life. To those who ask "How are you?" we reply, "Thank God", if you engage in any activity and we are well able to express the hope that we usually resort to 'expression, "If God wants "(" Inshallah ") in every public speech we usually begin with the phrase" In the name of God Merciful, the Compassionate. "
Unlike what happens in today's Europe, and particularly in those who underwent tyranny on culture and science eclesiastica an organization that has little to do with the words of the Holy Prophet Jesus, Muslims believe in God, is deemed to be under its eternal and immutable laws, try to adjust their individual actions as He revealed to us through His Prophets. Scalfari that probably escaped the major events of the young and the masses of people who filled the streets by the millions and kept them for weeks were filled with faster when it came out of Friday prayers in the mosque issued;
2 - The young revolutionaries of northern Africa and the Middle East has made use of modern means of communication, which, moreover, have as their starting point in the mathematical sciences courses Europe from the Islamic civilization and thought greek barbarized returned to Europe from scholars of the universities of Cairo, Damascus, Cordoba, Toledo and then to Istanbul, but the use of these facilities has declined by a force that non-Muslim can not understand: what is received when the prostrations of prayer handed down by the Sunna, everyone, bowing with his forehead touching the ground and knows that its Head and Hand of God is between him and the Creator there is no middleman. We are Sunni Muslims do not have priests, nor bishops, nor popes Unlike what happens in today's Europe, and particularly in those who underwent tyranny on culture and science eclesiastica an organization that has little to do with the words of the Holy Prophet Jesus, Muslims believe in God, is deemed to be under its eternal and immutable laws, try to adjust their individual actions as He revealed to us through His Prophets. Scalfari that probably escaped the major events of the young and the masses of people who filled the streets by the millions and kept them for weeks were filled with faster when it came out of Friday prayers in the mosque issued; 3 - It is now that young Muslims are thrown almost defenseless against the bullets and tanks of the West and its derivatives, have done so for decades against Cyrenaica colonialism, fascism, have done so for decades, young Algerians against the French paratroopers of Colonel Massu torturers, they did and they do the young Palestinians, who have dealt with in the Intifada against the Israeli occupation, armed with only stones and shouting "Allah -U-Akbar ", and brought him too young Iranians when, at the beginning of the revolution against the Shah (so similar in his clownish glitz to the clown of Tripoli) became killing tens of thousands by the secret police of the tyrant of Tehran. I am reminded, by assonance sentimental words of a beautiful poem that a poet born and raised in the Arab Muslim Sicily wrote in the aftermath of ethnic cleansing carried out by Arab anti Angevin French called by the Pope to crush the dream of a Mediterranean kingdom fertilized by the encounter of cultures and Arab, Jewish, Christian Frederick II: "Farewell Sicily, my beloved homeland, whose flavors are brought to me at the sunset and the wind is from the west Goodbye Sicily, land of honor, whose young people face death with courage and with smiling eyes "; 4 - On these young people who invoke God, Al Qaeda can not do any decision, because grim death exporters led by a self-styled sheikh who has probably never read the Koran, or if he has read it has forgotten the most important things, or perhaps read falsified version with CIA financing the university of Nebraska and distributed to young fanatics in Afghanistan for holy war against the Soviets, they have nothing to do with the message of peace, freedom and justice that resonates on every page of our holy book . Al Qaeda is a fascist movement and sign is the result of the contagion that has produced the worst the West to broadcast to the Islamic world in the centuries of colonial rule; 
5 - I note with amused curiosity as the West is a nightmare, in addition to the loss of energy supplies and the arrival of "wild hordes" of bearded Muslim with clothes stuffed with TNT (I remember that in an article in the Po Valley was called "Horde" also ship full of Kurdish refugees fleeing from gas fired at American aircraft profusion of Saddam Hussein), the possible return of a Muslim caliphate extended from the Atlantic to the borders of India. Apart from the consideration that those caliphates in the centuries of their flowers were one of the highest manifestations of human history, I would ask those who are concerned about this kind because the peoples of Europe, different language and religion, divided by hundreds of bloody wars of dynasty and religion, including the two World Wars of the last century have been able to do with all the duties praised the European Union, while the Arab people united by language, common culture and the basic Their religion should not be doing anything that might be called the United States or the Arab Arab Union: who would call caliphate can not be accommodated, the word caliph comes from the Arabic and the Koran and Islam the only true Kalifa ( vicar), God is the human being, provided by the Creator as well as the gift of life, that of reason and desire for knowledge. Eugenio Scalfari I know that is a regular reader of Voltaire and deep, the urge to reread the wonderful secular prayer that concludes the Treaty on the tolerance of the great Frenchman: "I appeal to you, O God of all time, of all people and all the worlds ... Let everyone be reminded that they brothers, and let each day remember to take a few minutes of their day to thank you in a thousand different languages \u200b\u200bfrom Siam to California to thank you for the gift you have given them by giving them life. "
in there who does not believe in God something in common with Catholics who confuse faith with being Catholic. Many lay people believe that secularism does not mean I believe in God because I am deeply secular values \u200b\u200bof freedom, equality and fraternity. In addition to these values \u200b\u200bI believe in God who is compassionate and merciful, but also justice, and so there is no contradiction between the streets shouting "God is Greatest" and fight for freedom as my brothers are doing and sisters in Tunisia, Libya, Egypt, Yemen, Palestine these days, and as the God who is Just and is calling for their leader, the victory will come. 5 - I note with amused curiosity as the West is a nightmare, in addition to the loss of energy supplies and the arrival of "wild hordes" of bearded Muslim with clothes stuffed with TNT (I remember that in an article in the Po Valley was called "Horde" also ship full of Kurdish refugees fleeing from gas fired at American aircraft profusion of Saddam Hussein), the possible return of a Muslim caliphate extended from the Atlantic to the borders of India. Apart from the consideration that those caliphates in the centuries of their flowers were one of the highest manifestations of human history, I would ask those who are concerned about this kind because the peoples of Europe, different language and religion, divided by hundreds of bloody wars of dynasty and religion, including the two World Wars of the last century have been able to do with all the duties praised the European Union, while the Arab people united by language, common culture and the basic Their religion should not be doing anything that might be called the United States or the Arab Arab Union: who would call caliphate can not be accommodated, the word caliph comes from the Arabic and the Koran and Islam the only true Kalifa ( vicar), God is the human being, provided by the Creator as well as the gift of life, that of reason and desire for knowledge. Eugenio Scalfari I know that is a regular reader of Voltaire and deep, the urge to reread the wonderful secular prayer that concludes the Treaty on the tolerance of the great Frenchman: "I appeal to you, O God of all time, of all people and all the worlds ... Let everyone be reminded that they brothers, and let each day remember to take a few minutes of their day to thank you in a thousand different languages \u200b\u200bfrom Siam to California to thank you for the gift you have given them by giving them life. " 
PS: In the prayer on Friday, men and women of all Islamic nations, with all their skin colors and dress different from the Bosnian and blonde with blue eyes as ebony blacks to Senegal, have joined in places of worship in Italy, because of governments intolerant and obtuse We can not call mosques, we all pray for our brothers of the Libyans to be freed soon as the bloody clown to ridicule the Italian Prime Minister was not ashamed to kiss his hands. Saturday, February 26, 2011
Some Design Of Sarees
the demonization of so-called Islamic fundamentalism
"In life, death, love and nature ... In its entirety ... the rocks and stones, crystals, trees, stars, wind and water, land , fire, rocks ... to creation of Allah ... Everything vibrates .... Everything is alive ... May Allah forgive our shortcomings, may Allah forgive our superficial ... "
"What we would like to convey, in a clear and immediate is what part of Islam and what is not. We want to stress that Islam respects all other people, not judge them because only God has the right to judge, does not affect the freedom or rights of others, because only God converts hearts, never men, much less force. So there is no contempt for those who are not like us, they want to do prosemitismo. There can be no compulsion in religion. If God wanted everyone would believe in Him on earth. Maybe you want to force all men until they are believers? Remember, you are only a warner, but you're not on their levying non-believers. It is not about you driving, but it is Allah who guides whom He will. A soul can believe only with the permission of Allah. We intend only to introduce to those who want what the original Islam, what are the sources and the main rules. "
"In life, death, love and nature ... In its entirety ... the rocks and stones, crystals, trees, stars, wind and water, land , fire, rocks ... to creation of Allah ... Everything vibrates .... Everything is alive ... May Allah forgive our shortcomings, may Allah forgive our superficial ... "
"What we would like to convey, in a clear and immediate is what part of Islam and what is not. We want to stress that Islam respects all other people, not judge them because only God has the right to judge, does not affect the freedom or rights of others, because only God converts hearts, never men, much less force. So there is no contempt for those who are not like us, they want to do prosemitismo. There can be no compulsion in religion. If God wanted everyone would believe in Him on earth. Maybe you want to force all men until they are believers? Remember, you are only a warner, but you're not on their levying non-believers. It is not about you driving, but it is Allah who guides whom He will. A soul can believe only with the permission of Allah. We intend only to introduce to those who want what the original Islam, what are the sources and the main rules. "The quotes above are taken from a book, translated into Italian, is headed , "20 key principles to know Islam." The author is Imam Hassan Al-Banna, Egyptian founder and spiritual leader of the "terrifying cult" that stirs the dreams of those who do not know nothing of Islam: the Muslim Brotherhood.
I spoke to the formula of conversion to Islam three years ago and now I weigh on my way to skin the prejudices, clichés, the contempt that especially in this part of Italy hit the Muslims. The comments were more charitable to my conversion: "He must be mad!", But no later than four days ago a lady that has given her courage declined you are, I was honored to be a telephone call with anonymous I define an understatement "an avalanche of insults "He had just read of my election as the legal representative of the Association of Italian Muslims living in Vicenza.
may seem excessive self-centeredness to talk about a personal case in a historical event, which will profoundly change the character of the Mediterranean but it is not.
In an article in Corriere della Sera, a reader, who, at least, treat with respect those who have a different religion has decided to recognize, among the reasons for the tumultuous uprising of the peoples of north African and presumably the entire Arab world, the humiliation that was inflicted in this world from ruthless and greedy despots made to control entire nations to defend the interests Cheap West. may seem excessive self-centeredness to talk about a personal case in a historical event, which will profoundly change the character of the Mediterranean but it is not.
There is no doubt that this is a possible reason, but identify it as the sole or predominant ignores many other more serious reasons. 
The cause of pan-Arab revolution is the humiliation of peoples of ancient civilizations to which Europe is a strong debt to arbitrary colonial rule, rapacious, cruel and bloody by the so-called European powers.
Who is so afraid of so-called Islamic fundamentalism, forget that the French colonization of Algeria set for over 100 years has cost the people of Algerian war of liberation with over a million dead, the colonization ragged pre-fascist Italy and fascist on Libya, and in particular Cyrenaica was paid by the Libyan people with over 200 000 deaths in a population of one million, Egypt's largest university of Al-Azhar, the great library of Alexandria for millennia one of the cradles of human civilization, has had to endure the ' ignominy of unjust British protectorate; civilized peoples, also descendants of civilizations that are the foundation of our culture (the Sumerians and Babylonians of Mesopotamia, Persia of Cyrus the Great and the great poet Omar Kayan) were the subject of contention between France, England and Russia, with the icing of the final creation of the state of Israel. All this and more victims of aggression have reacted with the secular fundamentalism and extremism, which is typical of most desperate fighting. But the West has done a blind eye, he thought only to perpetuate the use of natural resources of those countries by warning of this possibility that the despots in the last 50 years have ruled the Arab people with the secret police, with private militias, with the total lack of freedom, with the most total robbery, which has reduced poverty in a rich country like Algeria. The cause of pan-Arab revolution is the humiliation of peoples of ancient civilizations to which Europe is a strong debt to arbitrary colonial rule, rapacious, cruel and bloody by the so-called European powers. And while it's me, a Sunni, will also speak of what happened in Iran of Shiite ayatollahs, and stressing that I do between Shiites and Sunnis There's bad blood. In Iran post-war Iraq, mandated by an agreement between Soviet and American the young Shah Reza Pehl were held democratic elections that were won by the Nationalist Party Istaqlal in coalition with the communist Tudeh party named as the nationalist Prime Minister Mossadeq. The senior leader was a man of Western cultural background, but made the mistake of nationalizing the oil fields and refineries of Abadan, a hunting ground of the Seven Sisters of the Gulf. Mossadeq remained head of government for just over a year, then a nice coup and deposed him, including massacres, deportations, torture, mass delivered to Iran was the Shah's tyrannical rule. Mossadegh died in a mental hospital but his followers and the Tudeh activists were hunted ruthlessly with tens of thousands of deaths.
Power Shah lasted a few decades, then the Iranian people lost patience and forced him to flee the country after more than a month, the royalist troops in Tehran provoked only ten thousand victims, firing on crowds to get up zero demonstrating against the tyranny .
power passed into the hands of the Shia clergy, under the leadership of Ayatollah Khomeini, returned from long exile from Paris. To think that after a brutal tyranny and the destruction of the middle class educated and enlightened could be born in Iran for some form of democracy is part of the West's hypocritical illusions. Khomeini was a tyrant, such as those that come to power by revolution of a people exasperated, but they forget that presidents were elected after him Iran's Ayatollah Raf as a moderate and Sajani Khatani as an educated man, a philosopher degree in theoretical philosophy at a German university. Iran enjoyed a period of cautious liberalization despite the aggression suffered by Saddam Hussein, armed to the teeth by the Americans (he was the future defense minister that the U.S. supplied with gas). Iran paid for the assault with a million dead, but the Iranian people forced Saddam to retreat with his tail between his legs. The coming to power of Ahmadinejad as an extremist demagogue was in large part the fruit of the poisonous Bush's war on the borders of Iran, and behind the proclaimed aim of exporting democracy and fight Al Qaeda hiding in a fairly even crude to capture the purpose of Iran's oil and make handsome profits from reconstruction of a country virtually destroyed.
Iran is not a country of liberal institutions, but rather is an unbearable tyranny in this country, yet 47% of graduates are women, the majority of doctors are female, the Jewish minority is entitled under the Constitution to have four deputies in parliament, while the Chaldean Christians are allowed to grow in spite of the vast vineyards Shiite Muslims do not drink wine. The Ayatollah said: "The Christians have used wine in their Holy Mass". As recently as three years ago, the Ayatollah, concerned about the explosive population growth led a determined campaign in person for limiting births to distribute anti birth control immediately after Friday prayers in mosques. Let
comparison, about fundamentalism with the Pope's speech which condemned the use of condoms in African countries, where 30% of the population is HIV-positive AIDS tests.
Friday, February 25, 2011
Sharking Europe On Itouch
AGAIN SHAME! SHAME SHAME ON ITALY STILL
"You put a sharper focus now that was merely theoretical: the local despots who for various reasons and with different shades of arrogance ruled North Africa in recent decades, they were there for our comfortable and our security. served to protect the "Islamic threat" in its various forms, religious fanaticism and mass migration, which coincide in classical xenophobic vision, which sees boats full jihadists heading to our shores as they did the pirates Saracen. "
" Islamic fanaticism exists, and even the mass migration is not a ghost, but a matter of flesh and territory. What we did not anticipate, however, is that there are the Arab people, many millions of human beings in their house they realized they do not want to live poor and subjugated. Have overlooked or underestimated their existence, their rights, their ability to self-determination was the last legacy of Eurocentric racism, that when he spoke of the "Arab masses" imagined manoeuvrable with a flock of disenfranchised many sticks and few carrots. Now the flock has its own face, his words, his death, hunting spotlight governments and tyrants. We are so worried about our future not to understand that it is them that you are talking about. ""You put a sharper focus now that was merely theoretical: the local despots who for various reasons and with different shades of arrogance ruled North Africa in recent decades, they were there for our comfortable and our security. served to protect the "Islamic threat" in its various forms, religious fanaticism and mass migration, which coincide in classical xenophobic vision, which sees boats full jihadists heading to our shores as they did the pirates Saracen. "
Michele Serra, La Repubblica, 25/02/2011
The criminal madman who has tyrannized Libya for more than 40 years in his" replay "raving television, after the first accused in the United States and even Italy," Berlusconi of his friend "of fomenting the revolt of the" rats "felt it was cheaper due to its murderous move to accuse Al Qaeda and Islamic fundamentalism, after threatening to cut off energy supplies Europe (including "Berlusconi's friend") considered more productive to raise the specter of the invasion of millions of people on our shores, now that there are no more his ships to patrol the Libyan coast and capture the desperation of the barges to be closed in concentration camps or sent to die of thirst in the Sahara desert. It 'strange that the two arguments of the offender in Bedouin costume were immediately used by the pseudo Italian government. Berlusconi, after having declared to feel pleasure in seeing the "wind of democracy" shake the palms of Libya, was quick to add that we must think of the following: with this we mean that the wind can also carry dangerous Muslim migrants and jihadists. Minister Maroni abetting with others (Frattini, the Russian company and bad) of millions of illegal immigrants arriving from Africa: cataclysm, it unanimously rejected by the rest of Europe. Moreover, foreign workers who worked as migrants in Libya have preferred to retreat to Tunisia and Egypt, knowing full well to find even in those countries burdened with appalling problems, the most hospitable and most civilized of the xenophobic Lega arrays that govern Italy.
But there is no limit to the shamelessness of political personnel and covering functions of power in our country. And so:
1 - The Italian ambassador to Tripoli said that in his eyes the situation was rather quiet: the affirmation has arrived on our television screens in the days when Gaddafi bombed the suburbs of the Libyan capital, while his band of mercenaries went around the houses to murder men, women and children, including infants;
2 - The bishop of the diocese of Tripoli , which manages about 6,000 residents Catholics in his diocese (but Christians have not all been killed in Muslim-majority countries?), the same day said, always on TV "that:" In Tripoli, is today a beautiful sunny day , and everything is quiet. "could add that it was facing a scenario almost heavenly"
3 - The boorish Mr Giovanardi, Parliamentary Assembly of the PDL, called hoaxes pictures of mass graves dug on the shores of Tripoli to bury the thousands of deaths: "What was common?" said the "great man", "There was only photographed in a cemetery where tombs and well-ordered individual was buried a few dead" (presumably a natural death). Ignore the rogue that Islam does not know the custom of the mass graves, because every deceased must be buried in a pit with the individual body facing Mecca;
4 - The only concern of all the scoundrels who have supported the claim of George Bush to export all over the world "democracy" was to point out serious risks which runs the economy of our country if we lose the contracts of Italian oil companies with the despot murderess. Of course, this same concern is also in other European countries, but in none of them in Italy as it has become a dramatic obsession;
5 - The last excuse to justify the fact that the Italian government is the single, global , has not yet established adequate words with Gaddafi was to safeguard the lives of many having Italian citizens residing in Libya around 1500, of which more than 1,000 already returned. In this regard it should be emphasized that the other major European countries have a much greater number of their fellow-citizens residing in Libya, not to mention the Egyptians, Tunisians, Algerians, Filipinos, Indians, Finally, the Pakistanis and 12 000 Chinese citizens.
Probably the latter fear is a direct daughter of a guilty conscience that Italy has against the Libyan people, not only and not for the warm friendship that our prime minister has expressed in his "friend's Gaddafi," but also because the Libyans have not forgotten and have inherited from their fathers and grandfathers of the story that the Italian troops ferocious massacres perpetrated in the "fourth shore" from 1911 to 1931 (200,000 deaths in a population of less than one million inhabitants). A final notation. Almost all Italian media have repeatedly beaten on the fact that in Libya there are still the "tribe". In pseudo vision of those who ignore the most basic principles of cultural anthropology, the term "tribe" refers horizons primitive and wild, chaotic and most of the time fierce. It ignores the fact that the tribe is the typical human and organizational form required to the nomadic peoples who live on large desert areas having as a last resort economic sheep farming and cattle breeding: it is still for the Central Asian populations, for the Mongols, for the Arabs of the desert areas and in some ways, of large areas of Australia and even the Scottish Highlands (not to mention the indigenous peoples of North America, the Argentine gauchos ecc.ecc.ecc.).
Thursday, February 24, 2011
Wisdom Tooth Falling Apart
Corriere della Sera 02/24/2011
(Gian Antonio Stella)
selfishness and fears
But if you were named Pedro or Jose and were bombarded by a coup South American? If you were called or
Pak Koo and were machine-gunned by a North Korean executioner? If you were called Oja or Boris and were slaughtered by a butcher cetniko new? It is the question that gnaws at how many Italian politicians look to the massacre of the Libyans making one question: what about us? Of course, it is obvious that we ask the question of what will happen to our house. What's more, is sacrosanct. How many desperate to overturn the boats to our shores if everything was in the worst way? How could we ever manage wave of migration? Can we be both vigilant guardians of a filter is essential and good Samaritans to the rescue of a suffering humanity? What would the other Europeans? They will come to help us look away or leaving in the lurch?
We have some of the other two more responsibility. The first is that what Ronald Reagan called "the dog of Tripoli"
and today he is angry biting its own citizens, was until a few days ago revered and flattered, to more or less degrees of flattery, for some 'all Italian governments. Convinced that "you can not choose your neighbors 'and deep down it was better for us that Africa was the nearest crushed under the heel of some' leaders of muscle rather than exposed to the dangerous thrills of democracy. The second is summed up in a tune on the invasion of Libya in 1911 in the prologue resonates boldly: "Astounded all Muslims stood upright to nose / but all of a sudden head-bombs and the fire came / besieged and bombarded both above and below / the vile corrupt people bowed to Italy." Here, exactly a century after the brutal conquest of the "sand box" after decades of contempt for those people "inavvezze to work," after photos of our firing squads to shoot the kids even after the concentration camps in the desert of Sirte, where Angelo Del Boca has shown that killed tens of thousands of women, children and old people, we owe those Libyans took to the streets to get rid of a capricious and cruel dictator duties more. It's just that we care 'Even' for us. But it's not just us.
The Republic "FEAR OF PROGRESS "
1 - The prime minister Silvio Berlusconi, who has not yet had good taste directly and personally to accuse his partner of Libyan genocide was ongoing at our doors. The prince of Arcore welcomes wind of democracy, however, "We must also think about later ..." namely, the danger of Islamic fundamentalism;
2 - The dis-Mr Lamberto Dini, President of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, which was not ashamed to say that the Italian government must act to save the Gaddafi to power;
24/02/2011 (Gad Lerner)
More than a month now since the beginning of the Arab revolution that reshapes the features of the Mediterranean basin in which we find ourselves, finally, through gritted teeth, our Prime Minister has uttered the words "wind of freedom". Neither even dared to admit that after nearly 42 years of dictatorship - twice as Mussolini! - Is indeed welcome as long as you can away from that bloody partner in Berlusconi has just kissed the murderous hand in public. Even the figures of a real catastrophe in Libya have led him to formally request that Gaddafi has assured a court of international justice.
How come there is still a similar cowardly hesitation, shared in a more fair by most of the Italian ruling class? How embarrassing moral gap with the declaration of a hero of democracy, Vaclav Havel, who also yesterday compared the upheavals of 2011 in North Africa to "her" 1989, when the popular uprising resulted in the fall of Communist regimes in Central and Eastern Europe.
explain such a contrast is embarrassing. The mood with which our establishment afraid assists, paralyzed, impetuous march of history, in fact, a decline in Italian certifies experienced as inevitable. As if there were precluded react to powerlessness in ourselves, and Europe with us, we would be condemned to resign.
Yet it should help a dynamic view of Italian history, a hundred and fifty years since the founding of the unified state. We should nevertheless be remembered as our Peninsula has known centuries of economic and cultural supremacy, not surprisingly, among the Thousand and One thousand five hundred, when Italy Humanism and the Renaissance has made virtue of its geographical formation that stretched the projects to the center of the Mediterranean. That very fortunate position, thousands of miles of coastline, is now described with victimization by our rulers, as a disgrace to curse. As if Southern Italy, close to Africa and the Middle East, which was an appendix to unwillingly bear the weight.
This myopia is likely to cause us to lose a crucial appointment with history. How can we ignore that we have experienced the Italian season happier thanks to the commercial and intellectual hegemony that our destiny intertwined maritime republics before, and then Venice, managed to achieve with the cosmopolitan cities of the Levant and the Maghreb? How can we deny that its failure to harmonious development of the southern Mediterranean, with economic and demographic imbalances it causes, has been detrimental to our growth as a ball and chain? We were deceived, for decades, support of totalitarian regimes that constitute the best guarantee to meet the threat of terrorism and the flow of migrants, while also ensuring energy supply. In support of this realpolitik proved in bankruptcy today, we have elaborate array of neo-colonial racist theories: that our neighbors would be by their nature unsuited to democracy, refractory to civil progress. Up to use even for them the concept of "democratura," as if Arab societies could govern only with a mix of democracy (fake) and dictatorship (true). the other hand, remember, it was the only European statesman Giulio Andreotti that exerts its disappointment at the fall of the Berlin Wall ("I love Germany so much to want to maintain two separate"). Berlusconi has only exacerbated by actor businessman he is, a vocation to the support of tyrants have grown across the Mediterranean by his predecessors. Ignoring the malaise of Arab society, abandoning to their fate of those secular intellectuals and progressive region, seen the inevitable dominance of the Islamic aversion to the West.
The failure of this acclaimed Mediterranean policy based on partnerships with tyrants - but then praised Israel as the only democracy in the region - now gives way to an alarm recriminatorio. To read the statements of our ministers, the "wind of freedom" blowing raging between North Africa and the Levant does not deserve our appreciation for the "Arab street" and is always still a threat.
After the fall of Ben Ali, with the arrival in Lampedusa, a few thousand refugees, Roberto Maroni has discovered good and recognized that it is a 'humanitarian emergency ", then emphasized even as biblical exodus. " Except immediately after arguing with the indifference of an European Union is certainly not benevolent towards Italy, today suffers from repeated international condemnation of the policy prepared by the same rejections Maroni agreement with Gaddafi. Errors that are charged at a distance.
Now what Italo-Libyan Treaty of 2008 should be reduced to waste paper certainly provide a new strategy based on the European concert. But for this purpose does not encourage the figures shoot at random what is the point three hundred thousand migrant advocate in the near future? Worse yet is the blame game concerning the already started between the various Italian regions, while Bossi boldly promises to redirect in Germany, unspecified numbers of refugees. Ending up just to give reason to the other EU countries which have good game to highlight data in hand, as Italy today accept a number of asylum seekers and new migrants much lower than other large European countries.
Our credentials in the field of hospitality and humanitarian sensitivity are minimized. This does not facilitate the relationship with Brussels in the necessary joint management of the emergency.
Much of the outcome of the political upheavals taking place will depend on our behavior. But we, we, on the right side? We have endeavored to protect our neighbors from a ferocious repression? The United States of Obama were more ready to support change in Europe. And alas Italy into Europe, that is the nation that has more interest in the growth of open societies in the southern Mediterranean, are shown in the most reluctant to distance themselves from dictators.
This attitude instinctive revealed a deficit that characterizes our cultural elite array northerner. Sorry to resort to clichés, but some ministers talk like old "polentone" frightened by the potential of cosmopolitanism Mediterranean, which they lived (in ignorance) only as a threat. As if the story had nothing to teach an old nation, whose average age is nearly two decades higher than those of young and vibrant company are rebelling. As if we were condemned to be afraid of progress to the point of not even imagine a democratic future shared by all peoples of our sea.
We have entrusted to the two preceding articles, the task of saving the honor and good name of Italy compared to the terrible tragedy of the people Libyan murdered by Gaddafi (who after blathering on about a conspiracy that would have American and Italian armed revolution against him, was in his latest rant television brought up al-Qaeda). Those who dishonor our country are in order:
The failure of this acclaimed Mediterranean policy based on partnerships with tyrants - but then praised Israel as the only democracy in the region - now gives way to an alarm recriminatorio. To read the statements of our ministers, the "wind of freedom" blowing raging between North Africa and the Levant does not deserve our appreciation for the "Arab street" and is always still a threat.
After the fall of Ben Ali, with the arrival in Lampedusa, a few thousand refugees, Roberto Maroni has discovered good and recognized that it is a 'humanitarian emergency ", then emphasized even as biblical exodus. " Except immediately after arguing with the indifference of an European Union is certainly not benevolent towards Italy, today suffers from repeated international condemnation of the policy prepared by the same rejections Maroni agreement with Gaddafi. Errors that are charged at a distance.
Now what Italo-Libyan Treaty of 2008 should be reduced to waste paper certainly provide a new strategy based on the European concert. But for this purpose does not encourage the figures shoot at random what is the point three hundred thousand migrant advocate in the near future? Worse yet is the blame game concerning the already started between the various Italian regions, while Bossi boldly promises to redirect in Germany, unspecified numbers of refugees. Ending up just to give reason to the other EU countries which have good game to highlight data in hand, as Italy today accept a number of asylum seekers and new migrants much lower than other large European countries.
Our credentials in the field of hospitality and humanitarian sensitivity are minimized. This does not facilitate the relationship with Brussels in the necessary joint management of the emergency.
Much of the outcome of the political upheavals taking place will depend on our behavior. But we, we, on the right side? We have endeavored to protect our neighbors from a ferocious repression? The United States of Obama were more ready to support change in Europe. And alas Italy into Europe, that is the nation that has more interest in the growth of open societies in the southern Mediterranean, are shown in the most reluctant to distance themselves from dictators.
This attitude instinctive revealed a deficit that characterizes our cultural elite array northerner. Sorry to resort to clichés, but some ministers talk like old "polentone" frightened by the potential of cosmopolitanism Mediterranean, which they lived (in ignorance) only as a threat. As if the story had nothing to teach an old nation, whose average age is nearly two decades higher than those of young and vibrant company are rebelling. As if we were condemned to be afraid of progress to the point of not even imagine a democratic future shared by all peoples of our sea.
We have entrusted to the two preceding articles, the task of saving the honor and good name of Italy compared to the terrible tragedy of the people Libyan murdered by Gaddafi (who after blathering on about a conspiracy that would have American and Italian armed revolution against him, was in his latest rant television brought up al-Qaeda). Those who dishonor our country are in order:
1 - The prime minister Silvio Berlusconi, who has not yet had good taste directly and personally to accuse his partner of Libyan genocide was ongoing at our doors. The prince of Arcore welcomes wind of democracy, however, "We must also think about later ..." namely, the danger of Islamic fundamentalism;
2 - The dis-Mr Lamberto Dini, President of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, which was not ashamed to say that the Italian government must act to save the Gaddafi to power;
3 - The League in general, which knows only think the wave of illegal immigrants who could pour on the Italian coast (it is come to assume 3 million refugees). Almost certainly the concern of the League are unfounded so far those who flee from Libya found refuge and hospitality in Egypt and Tunisia, perhaps because they know what rules are applied in Italy barbaric even against those who would be entitled, under the rules international right to political asylum.
repeat what we said yesterday: "God is compassionate and merciful, but it is also fair and no discounts to those who violate the basic laws of justice and truth."
Wednesday, February 23, 2011
Pizza Flavored Chips 90's
!
"We would willingly do without the mood light in the face of tragedies such as Libya, but inevitably the parable of Colonel Qaddafi unleashed catastrophic in the worst bar in our town satirical fantasies, half and half political and diplomatic his destiny: to eventually Arcore dividing the room with his friend Putin or Antigua, alone or with a cart on the Nig of Amazons to follow? And what uniform, if it escapes choose in her wardrobe? The hieratic Bedouin from scratch or from the general crazy borrowed from the worst traditions of the West colonizer or do both to report the disaster produced by colonialism military and tribal arc? And above all: what are thinking in these hours, Miss recruited to pseudo Mazi to listen to the lessons of the Koran is a guy who bombed his own people? They will have grasped the difference between a convention and the stage of indoctrination created an iron axis Rome-Tripoli / Berlusconi-Gaddafi, or think you only have a week to pay worked slightly more colorful than normal? And if they have kept the veil provided free by the Libyan tyrant, will spare a thought to the Libyan women who now use the veil to wipe the blood of their dead? "
We mentioned this short comment that Michele Serra dedicated to the tragedy Libyan La Repubblica on 23/02/2011. "We would willingly do without the mood light in the face of tragedies such as Libya, but inevitably the parable of Colonel Qaddafi unleashed catastrophic in the worst bar in our town satirical fantasies, half and half political and diplomatic his destiny: to eventually Arcore dividing the room with his friend Putin or Antigua, alone or with a cart on the Nig of Amazons to follow? And what uniform, if it escapes choose in her wardrobe? The hieratic Bedouin from scratch or from the general crazy borrowed from the worst traditions of the West colonizer or do both to report the disaster produced by colonialism military and tribal arc? And above all: what are thinking in these hours, Miss recruited to pseudo Mazi to listen to the lessons of the Koran is a guy who bombed his own people? They will have grasped the difference between a convention and the stage of indoctrination created an iron axis Rome-Tripoli / Berlusconi-Gaddafi, or think you only have a week to pay worked slightly more colorful than normal? And if they have kept the veil provided free by the Libyan tyrant, will spare a thought to the Libyan women who now use the veil to wipe the blood of their dead? "
I just want to add some considerations to Italian Muslim: 1 - For Muslims, the Quran is the book that bears the word of God, when we take it in your hands is a good rule lavarsele before and when we read a story is also a good idea to bend the head and bring the book to his forehead and heart. A charlatan who used to read the Qur'an to an audience of paying hostess recruited and begins to quibble like a clown on the sacred text that deserves only the most hopeless total contempt. Furthermore, where an individual like that bombard his people and unleash it against teams of mercenaries who have orders to kill anyone in their shot, pointing to contempt and shame the world is not enough: that gracious and merciful God punish him in the most appropriate ways in the name of justice and humanity; 2 - Shame on an individual who has publicly kissed her hands as if it were a saint or a prophet. The present its voters have pictures of Berlusconi, in a setting like a circus big bows in front of the Rais and is produced in a gallant "kiss hands"? And what about the phrase that our prime minister has given in response to reporters who asked him if he had phoned his friend Libyan intent to massacre hundreds of people: "Well! I did not want to disturb ..."?; 3 - And finally, what about our ineffable, dapper Foreign Minister Frattini which, last but not least compared to his counterparts around the world has given tentative words of disapproval, accompanied by a statement that democracy is not exportable? That comment needs to be done on the words of this same individual who, always on TV called the gangs of mercenaries hired by Gaddafi for massacring unarmed citizens have used the words "death squads of Islamic fundamentalists"? But shame also be accompanied by all those who, without having the courage to say, think that democracy is not something that can be gained by millions of people, especially young people taking to the streets in defiance of death, "Why Arabs are not ripe for democracy. " But God is Great and Merciful, and especially the Justice and knows more than all the "snake oil salesmen" of our house and think they know who deserves and who does not deserve: Why He Omniscient and Onnisapiente from everyone what it deserves and no discounts.
Ver Fotos De Pati Nabida
Islamic law - Islamic law
SOURCES OF ISLAMIC LAW: A - SOURCES.
The first source is the Qur'an. God is the only legislator: "He has established for you, in religion the same way he had recommended to Noah, Abraham, Moses, Jesus, and what we reveal to you O Muhammad." The law is known through the revealed word of God, the Koran.
The second source is the corpus of Hadith, which contains the words and deeds of Muhammad, that is, the Sunna (tradition of the Prophet). Towards the end of the seventh century, the prophetic Sunna began to be considered a source of interpretation of the Koran and the hadith it was the document, the first oral then written. Shortly after it formed small collections, while the ninth back classic collections of hadith, classified by themes of the two most important are those of Al-Bukhari (d. 870) and Muslim (d. 875). The Islamic system says that the Qur'an is revealed by God to the Prophet, while the hadith is inspired, that contains the words and actions inspired by God to Muhammad 
The hadith are production ended, nearly one million are known, collected and sorted in several different processed by traditionalists. These collections have a different normative for Muslims, they consider worthy of the utmost account of those of Al-Bukhari and Muslim, both called Al-Sahih (authentic). Islamic scholars consider authentic hadith about 7000. The road
vast majority of hadith were manufactured during the early centuries of Islam without any direct relation to the Prophet or his immediate companions, and for various political, sectarian, heretical doctrine, attributed to customary post-Prophet In support of the authorities. The hadith is therefore a source of religion and the law inevitably at the center of fierce debates about its reliability.
B - Fiqh.
After the death of Muhammad the growing problems of the Ummah require new solutions, and from that moment he began to establish Islamic law in the strict sense and that is the Fiqh.
thrusters it in the first two centuries of Islam, were those "devotees" who, wishing to impress the right to moral and religious ideas began a personal reflection for Islamization of society, through the application of Sharia. Even in the era of the Umayyad caliphs appointed governors of provinces the first judges (Qadi) to resolve disputes among Muslims. It was Therefore, the religious courts, in which modernize the administration of justice through tribal arbitration transition state which was the guarantor of justice. The passing of sentences reflecting on Sharia Qadi primary, but also by referring to the customary law of the Arabs and the legal institutions of the conquered countries, because the primary sources did not solve all situations. They exercised a role of creative interpretation, through reasoning (Ijtihad, an ongoing effort to personal reflection). In addition to the exercise of reasoning by analogy to solve new cases with similar cases in the Qur'an, the hadith and in the previous case they exerted based on Ijtihad two main sources and Ra 'Y (personal opinion). 
The Ra'y is the opinion of the jurist "in equity" which may be for discretionary review (Istihbab) of personal decision and rational (Istihsan) and chosen based on the general (or Istihlah maslaha). At the time of the Umayyad caliphate arose the schools of law (Madha 'Ib) in which each member retained a great deal of freedom of opinion. School sites were the main Kufa, Basra, Medina, Mecca and Damascus that were developed independently of each other. The legal theory in schools was drawn up in legal traditions calls Living Sunna or 'ideal practice Amal (dall'Ijma unified, consensus of the scholars of the middle school level).
Ijma acquired great importance due to a hadith regarding the infallibility of the Ummah, "My community does not grant ever to a mistake." In this way the Ijma soon became the third source of law after the Qur'an and the hadith. The schools quickly became personal in schools based on the tradition of the master and his successors. So Kufa became the school of Abu Hanifa, the Medina school Anas Ben Malik, a school was less than that of Sufyan Al-Thawri, Syria was based on Al-Awza 'I, then started the schools of the followers of Al-Shafi' I was born and Ibn Hanbal, and finally the school of Zahiriyya. After 1300 only survived the four classical schools. Shortly before the year one thousand sources of Islamic law were established and the great historian al-Tabari called the Sunna of wisdom such as the Islamic Koran, the religious knowledge and the Fiqh, which became the canonical sources of the following: The Quran, source text revealed by God and the Hadith / Sunna (tradition or inspired source text); Ijma (expressed by the legal consent of the Umma) Ijtihad (personal reflection of the efforts of teachers in schools) 'Urf (custom, if only by a few lawyers.
These principles are called Usul al-Fiqh (Sources of Law). The science around them is was built was systematized by the important leader Al-Shafi'i school: "The Koran and the Sunna are expressed as the absolute authority and primary schools: in particular it is noted that the Koran contains verses about 700 of which 500 relate to the legal and Ibadat 200 Mu'Amalat. Furthermore, the Sunnah has become over time the support of conservative Arab traditionalist, yet has undergone great changes, and in fact the Quran Sunna called the custom of God (ie the usual way of behaving. After death of the Prophet's Sunna pointed to the words and actions of Muhammad and his Companions, inspired by God and binding: "We sent a messenger to be obeyed by the will of God." Muhammad is considered example for the entire community: "You have a fine example in the Messenger of God for you, for he who hopes in Allah and the Last Day and remembers God often." With the advent of Islam the caliph stuns the role of the ancient court of justice administration and he himself became the producer of the Sunna. As the Islamic empire expanded rapidly, the caliph could not personally carry all the judicial role, and delegated the administration of justice but remains the owner. In this way the concept of Sunna had evolved through the legal schools of Fiqh. Thus was born the idea of \u200b\u200bthe Sunna of the Prophet, which is contained in the hadith that gradually became a source of objective law for pressure transmitters and the hadith that came to be identified with the practice, uninterrupted current ideal of the Ummah and the doctrine of the Ulema.
Thanks all'Ijma all'Ijtihad and Islamic law in the first three centuries was a system capable of meeting the needs socialu, even if it subsequently became a static and sacral.
As the cultural and social change was unstoppable in the new situations of life resorted to the use of the Fatwa (legal consultation and the response of a lawyer). Fatwa endorsed by the consensus of scholars to become part of the heritage of law schools. Then we added the doctrine that the great Ulema the past have outlived their function and that lawyers should be limited to explain and apply the doctrine laid down once and for all. The current thinking of the schools came to be attributed respectively to one or another companion of the Prophet chose as its founder, while closing the doors of Ijtihad led to the establishment of four major schools of law that define some differences in the fundamentals and contained the orthodoxy of interpretation of Sharia.
Tuesday, February 22, 2011
Canada Visa And Cruise And Alaska
third part - 2nd part
Already in the last decades of the Umayyad caliphs had been increasing the need to provide accommodation to an organic system of Islamic law in relation to the fact that more and more, to the extent that it expanded the domain Islam, peoples, cultures, different legal traditions always had severely diminished the character "Arab" Muslim territories. This need of accommodation increased with the advent of the Abbasid dynasty that went enriching cultural elements that went far beyond the scope arabofono to take on the character of "universal empire". To address the issue we must first of all explore three fundamental legal terms: "Sharia, Fiqh, Qanun"
A - The Sharia is a common term for the Arabic-speaking peoples of the Middle East. In the Qur'an the term meets 4 times and links to the meaning of "law" to the more general "Via saving outlined by God." From the point of view Sharia law is literally the "way that leads to water", and so it evokes life in a desert country like Saudi. A second meaning is "path" that the believer must follow to come to life thanks to the religious commandments laid down by God and revealed to Muhammad, Sharia law in this sense is synonymous with religion. Sometimes, however, the Sharia is presented as a positive law, ie as a series of precise rules, and sometimes down the general principles of behavior that allow a certain degree of creativity. Over the centuries, we see a shift, in the commentators of the Koran and the Ulema generally the wider the narrow sense of "divine positive law and clear rules of behavior."
Sharia becomes the law of God comprehensive, meticulously shaping the behavior of individuals and society and which would be phased to coincide with Islamic law. The Islamic giuristeriti (fuqaha) together determine the legal and moral character of human actions, classifying the various acts under 5 qualifiers: 1 - wajib (obligatory acts): These are for example the 5 pillars of faith. God punishes those who do not conclude without a just cause;
2 - Mandub (recommended acts): those who commit these acts receive a reward but neglects them who does not deserve punishment, such as "free prayer" and "Sadaqa" or free alms ; 3 - Haram (prohibited acts): who performs them is both men punished by God, the afterlife and sometimes in this life. Haran are theft, adultery, murder unjustified repudiation not Qur'anic 4 - makruh (reprehensible acts) in this category are certain valid forms of divorce, but no valid reason. God punishes those actions in the afterlife;
5 - Mubah (lawful acts or permissions): This is the most human actions. This determining the quality of acts is one of the forms of fulfillment of the Qur'anic commandment:
"Recommended good and forbid what is wrong." According to the dominant legal tradition and theological horizon, which is what theology Asharite, mail is not a moral concept "natural", based on research of reason to discover and interpret the project written by God in creation, but only a morality based on the positive revelation, that certain approaches to interpretation in many aggressive, often ending in the formalism. There is more to coexist in a unique hybrid of the two principles of law, human and divine, secular and religious institutions and their procedures and often conflicting.
B - Fiqh. If Sharia is the divine law, Fiqh is the science of the divine law, the result of a synthesis of two elements: first some data drawn from the Koran and the prophetic tradition (Sunna) of the other solutions worked out by human reason from the necessities of life. The Fiqh can be defined as a legal ethics theology of Islamic civilization, at the same time is wider and narrower than the Western notion of law. Fiqh (understanding) is the technical term for the science of Islamic law and jurisprudence, and because it indicates a human activity, it does not apply to God in the Prophet. The man is called by God to observe the Sharia to live in harmony with the cosmic order that he has established. Giuristeriti that I have the authority required in this area expose and process the Sharia that are in the primary sources of divine revelation and that is the Koran and the Sunna. The Fiqh embraces all spheres of life must be based on religion, but in turn the areas of application of Fiqh are usually 3: 1
- Ibadat, laws of worship and religious practice; 2 - Mu'Hamalat, laws regarding social life;
3 - Other areas include the spheres of law and constitutional law of criminal procedure laws of the state administration and the conduct of war. C - Qanun. The term has acquired a very general sense of the law or code. In the early days of the Islamic holders of power, especially the governors of provinces without specific legislative jurisdiction, enacted various laws in the field of public law and criminal law in which the Fiqh appeared insufficient or in the case of Koranic punishments too rigid. In the administrative field Qanun was never in conflict with Sharia law, which in fact was not, in the field of criminal law, however, sometimes the governors replaced the discretionary punishment to mutilation and death penalties provided for by the Koran. Following the Ottoman sultans legislate in other areas subject to Sharia. In modern and contemporary the Qanun to both the laws and codes inspired by Western laws (civil, commercial, administrative, criminal etc.. Etc..) Codes that reproduce both the simplified rules of sharia, such as some of the codes personal status (Syria, Iraq). The current procedure involves preparation of the Qanun of the rules committee, voting in the assembly and the enactment in the executive branch.
Already in the last decades of the Umayyad caliphs had been increasing the need to provide accommodation to an organic system of Islamic law in relation to the fact that more and more, to the extent that it expanded the domain Islam, peoples, cultures, different legal traditions always had severely diminished the character "Arab" Muslim territories. This need of accommodation increased with the advent of the Abbasid dynasty that went enriching cultural elements that went far beyond the scope arabofono to take on the character of "universal empire". To address the issue we must first of all explore three fundamental legal terms: "Sharia, Fiqh, Qanun"
A - The Sharia is a common term for the Arabic-speaking peoples of the Middle East. In the Qur'an the term meets 4 times and links to the meaning of "law" to the more general "Via saving outlined by God." From the point of view Sharia law is literally the "way that leads to water", and so it evokes life in a desert country like Saudi. A second meaning is "path" that the believer must follow to come to life thanks to the religious commandments laid down by God and revealed to Muhammad, Sharia law in this sense is synonymous with religion. Sometimes, however, the Sharia is presented as a positive law, ie as a series of precise rules, and sometimes down the general principles of behavior that allow a certain degree of creativity. Over the centuries, we see a shift, in the commentators of the Koran and the Ulema generally the wider the narrow sense of "divine positive law and clear rules of behavior."
Sharia becomes the law of God comprehensive, meticulously shaping the behavior of individuals and society and which would be phased to coincide with Islamic law. The Islamic giuristeriti (fuqaha) together determine the legal and moral character of human actions, classifying the various acts under 5 qualifiers: 1 - wajib (obligatory acts): These are for example the 5 pillars of faith. God punishes those who do not conclude without a just cause;
2 - Mandub (recommended acts): those who commit these acts receive a reward but neglects them who does not deserve punishment, such as "free prayer" and "Sadaqa" or free alms ; 3 - Haram (prohibited acts): who performs them is both men punished by God, the afterlife and sometimes in this life. Haran are theft, adultery, murder unjustified repudiation not Qur'anic 4 - makruh (reprehensible acts) in this category are certain valid forms of divorce, but no valid reason. God punishes those actions in the afterlife;
5 - Mubah (lawful acts or permissions): This is the most human actions. This determining the quality of acts is one of the forms of fulfillment of the Qur'anic commandment:
"Recommended good and forbid what is wrong." According to the dominant legal tradition and theological horizon, which is what theology Asharite, mail is not a moral concept "natural", based on research of reason to discover and interpret the project written by God in creation, but only a morality based on the positive revelation, that certain approaches to interpretation in many aggressive, often ending in the formalism. There is more to coexist in a unique hybrid of the two principles of law, human and divine, secular and religious institutions and their procedures and often conflicting.
B - Fiqh. If Sharia is the divine law, Fiqh is the science of the divine law, the result of a synthesis of two elements: first some data drawn from the Koran and the prophetic tradition (Sunna) of the other solutions worked out by human reason from the necessities of life. The Fiqh can be defined as a legal ethics theology of Islamic civilization, at the same time is wider and narrower than the Western notion of law. Fiqh (understanding) is the technical term for the science of Islamic law and jurisprudence, and because it indicates a human activity, it does not apply to God in the Prophet. The man is called by God to observe the Sharia to live in harmony with the cosmic order that he has established. Giuristeriti that I have the authority required in this area expose and process the Sharia that are in the primary sources of divine revelation and that is the Koran and the Sunna. The Fiqh embraces all spheres of life must be based on religion, but in turn the areas of application of Fiqh are usually 3: 1
- Ibadat, laws of worship and religious practice; 2 - Mu'Hamalat, laws regarding social life;
3 - Other areas include the spheres of law and constitutional law of criminal procedure laws of the state administration and the conduct of war. C - Qanun. The term has acquired a very general sense of the law or code. In the early days of the Islamic holders of power, especially the governors of provinces without specific legislative jurisdiction, enacted various laws in the field of public law and criminal law in which the Fiqh appeared insufficient or in the case of Koranic punishments too rigid. In the administrative field Qanun was never in conflict with Sharia law, which in fact was not, in the field of criminal law, however, sometimes the governors replaced the discretionary punishment to mutilation and death penalties provided for by the Koran. Following the Ottoman sultans legislate in other areas subject to Sharia. In modern and contemporary the Qanun to both the laws and codes inspired by Western laws (civil, commercial, administrative, criminal etc.. Etc..) Codes that reproduce both the simplified rules of sharia, such as some of the codes personal status (Syria, Iraq). The current procedure involves preparation of the Qanun of the rules committee, voting in the assembly and the enactment in the executive branch.
Monday, February 21, 2011
Sunday, February 20, 2011
Camera Inside Vergins
THE ISRAELI PALESTINIAN CONFLICT - Part 8
A demonstration of the unrealistic nature of the so-called roadmap to peace just scroll down the list of its members: the United States of America with their president, George Bush Jr. has distinguished himself in the months immediately following his adventurous choice for his total disregard for the Middle East issue. This is tantamount to a green light to any initiative of Sharon. After the Sept. 11, when it became necessary to secure the benevolent neutrality of the so-called Arab "moderates" in the proclaimed war against the Afghan regime and that has not yet confessed against Saddam Hussein, Bush has indeed offered the sugar of the intention to recognize an independent Palestinian state by ensuring the efforts of the U.S. government to do so. Of course they were just words. When the UN Security Council, the worsening spiral of attack / retaliation that has characterized the years of the Second Intifada, we discussed the possibility of sending Middle East into an international intervention force in Egda UN, the U.S. representative vetoed:
1 - 81 ° in the sixty years of UN history and 55 in favor of Israel
2 - While Russia has been invited only pro forma, because in the Middle East, after the esploit alcolistici President Yeltsin, the Middle East has no more than anything, the EU has not expressed a position to some extent independent of the Israeli lies in the eyes of almost all European governments Israel 's only democracy in the Middle East, and its inhabitants are the descendants of Holocaust survivors, and also who is fasting of history knows that at least the second "story" is a story contradicted by the facts: the overwhelming majority in Israel is Russian, North African and American, and the few survivors of the Holocaust until 1966 had to conceal from their fellow Israeli neo impressed by the tattoo Nazi concentration camps: "You have been cowards! There are fates slaughtered like lambs, without defending themselves, "commented many Israeli citizens." But we do not bend my head to any new perpetrators, even at the cost of causing World War III. "
3 - makes it quite incredible plan the Road Map peace there is also the condition of what should be the contracting parties, namely the Government of Israel and the Palestinian National Authority.
For the first partner should be noted that until 2006 the head of the Israeli government was Ariel Sharon, who took advantage of the second Intifada to sow the ruins of the cities of the West Bank and Gaza, to kill, accusing them of being "terrorists", the agents Palestinian police and even the urban Vigli, to imprison thousands of Palestinians on charges of "complicity in terrorism," and with this pretext has been erased from the political scene who could have been a credible new leadership of Arab Palestine.
Regarding the Palestinian Authority, it has been the subject of a move to larger radius by Sharon. The first link in the Israeli strategy was to remove any residual prestige Arafat accused on several occasions to be the Palestinian version of al-Qaida and Osama Bin Laden. Sharon has repeatedly refused to resume peace talks until the true inspiration behind the attacks against Israelis could be his interlocutor: "It will never get with that criminal Kefiah." Sharon has repeatedly called for Arafat to die in some accident, except to consume one of those against whom is a specialist in assassinations Mossad. Sharon has even planned to deport Arafat to admit it in some foreign hospital under the pretext of treating her Parkinson's disease. In 2003, the poor Arafat was forced to cede part of its very thin power to a prime minister "acceptable" to the Israelis, which was identified in the person of mild and harmless Abu Mazen.
Then came the final blow in elections for the legislature of the Palestinian Authority against all expectations Al-Fatah won, because in the meantime, Arafat was dead, but the feared Hamas movement that has eclipsed even the followers of Abu Mazen in Gaza and seized the city of all the levers of administrative power and the forces of security. In this way, Sharon has led to a substantial division into two parts of any potential Palestinian state: the West Bank, ruled by the moderate Abbas firmly under Israeli control, Gaza, monstrous city of over one million inhabitants and the density of population highest in the world, free to cook in its broth of hunger, unemployment, close siege and blockade of all supplies that have been made also because of the regime Egypt's Mubarak.
In 2006 Sharon was knocked out by a stroke and has a vegetable, instead took over the Israeli government which is colorless Hehudi Olmert was careful not to change the policy of his predecessor and to initiate only pretend to the famous Road Map to peace. The settlements "colonies" in the West Bank have continued to multiply, to affect the area immediately adjacent to Gaza. The Hamas leader had pledged to refrain from hostile acts against Israeli territory for 6 months at least if the settlements were not included. Faced with their dumb Israeli militants began launching Qassam rockets almost harmless in the southern part Israeli territory, with a violence that in 6 months were able to cause 3 victims, 2 of nomadic Bedouins. Meanwhile, Olmert had wanted to flex his muscles trying to invade the southern part of Lebanon where, departed with much greater effectiveness of missile attacks and Hezbollah, the Iranian Shiite Lebanese movement thread, which inflicted a resounding defeat in spite of the Israeli army carpet bombing with which the planes with the Star of David half-destroyed several cities of Lebanon. To make up for the bad impression that Olmert has triggered a criminal attack on the Gaza Strip. The operation, called "Lead Time" has resulted in 1535 in the city and an unknown number of victims wounded, almost all amputees hit by shrapnel because of phosphorous bombs, banned by international conventions, dropped on the hapless city. The Israeli navy has imposed a total blockade, which prevents Palestinians from Gaza even get close to the sea for fishing. The living conditions are unimaginable in the city and called for international solidarity and humanitarian organizations in many countries. The small fleet destined to bring food aid to the exhausted population was intercepted in international waters by Israeli navy: a Turkish ship was boarded and the Israeli military have resulted in 11 deaths.
very latest: the election of Obama had hoped for a change U.S. policy on the Israeli Palestinian. The contrast with the election of Obama was the appointment of well-known Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu who has defiantly ignored the repeated calls by the U.S. government to suspend the settlements of Jewish settlements in the West Bank. Two days ago the Israeli government has started the construction of a complex of 290 apartments in the Arab part of Jerusalem, provoking the outraged reaction of the UN Secretary General. The Security Council emergency meeting, unanimously approved with one vote against an agenda that enjoined Israel to stop the project. Opposing vote with adjoining exercise of veto power, have expressed the U.S. representative to the United Nations. And the 86th over sixty years.
The servants of the Americans perform on their newspapers' oscillations of American policy in the Middle East. "
Europe will perform rituals in his aspirations to the need for parties to return to the negotiating table and perhaps will again propose the sending of observers, to prevent a renewed outbreak of violence is certain, however, that you resign to pay each increase in the price of oil. But there is a variation from the past, Arab countries will step forward to do what they have always done: proclamations, protests and substantial American acquiescence to Israeli policy. The entire Arab world is getting rid of despots corrupt sheiks and mockeries Reucci ready to every game. The people with a great past and a legacy of ancient civilizations sooner or later awaken and impose the reasons of history and then "In the name of God the Merciful and Clement will be justice!" and Israel can not expect much from its neighbors.
A demonstration of the unrealistic nature of the so-called roadmap to peace just scroll down the list of its members: the United States of America with their president, George Bush Jr. has distinguished himself in the months immediately following his adventurous choice for his total disregard for the Middle East issue. This is tantamount to a green light to any initiative of Sharon. After the Sept. 11, when it became necessary to secure the benevolent neutrality of the so-called Arab "moderates" in the proclaimed war against the Afghan regime and that has not yet confessed against Saddam Hussein, Bush has indeed offered the sugar of the intention to recognize an independent Palestinian state by ensuring the efforts of the U.S. government to do so. Of course they were just words. When the UN Security Council, the worsening spiral of attack / retaliation that has characterized the years of the Second Intifada, we discussed the possibility of sending Middle East into an international intervention force in Egda UN, the U.S. representative vetoed:
1 - 81 ° in the sixty years of UN history and 55 in favor of Israel
2 - While Russia has been invited only pro forma, because in the Middle East, after the esploit alcolistici President Yeltsin, the Middle East has no more than anything, the EU has not expressed a position to some extent independent of the Israeli lies in the eyes of almost all European governments Israel 's only democracy in the Middle East, and its inhabitants are the descendants of Holocaust survivors, and also who is fasting of history knows that at least the second "story" is a story contradicted by the facts: the overwhelming majority in Israel is Russian, North African and American, and the few survivors of the Holocaust until 1966 had to conceal from their fellow Israeli neo impressed by the tattoo Nazi concentration camps: "You have been cowards! There are fates slaughtered like lambs, without defending themselves, "commented many Israeli citizens." But we do not bend my head to any new perpetrators, even at the cost of causing World War III. "
3 - makes it quite incredible plan the Road Map peace there is also the condition of what should be the contracting parties, namely the Government of Israel and the Palestinian National Authority.
For the first partner should be noted that until 2006 the head of the Israeli government was Ariel Sharon, who took advantage of the second Intifada to sow the ruins of the cities of the West Bank and Gaza, to kill, accusing them of being "terrorists", the agents Palestinian police and even the urban Vigli, to imprison thousands of Palestinians on charges of "complicity in terrorism," and with this pretext has been erased from the political scene who could have been a credible new leadership of Arab Palestine.
Regarding the Palestinian Authority, it has been the subject of a move to larger radius by Sharon. The first link in the Israeli strategy was to remove any residual prestige Arafat accused on several occasions to be the Palestinian version of al-Qaida and Osama Bin Laden. Sharon has repeatedly refused to resume peace talks until the true inspiration behind the attacks against Israelis could be his interlocutor: "It will never get with that criminal Kefiah." Sharon has repeatedly called for Arafat to die in some accident, except to consume one of those against whom is a specialist in assassinations Mossad. Sharon has even planned to deport Arafat to admit it in some foreign hospital under the pretext of treating her Parkinson's disease. In 2003, the poor Arafat was forced to cede part of its very thin power to a prime minister "acceptable" to the Israelis, which was identified in the person of mild and harmless Abu Mazen.
Then came the final blow in elections for the legislature of the Palestinian Authority against all expectations Al-Fatah won, because in the meantime, Arafat was dead, but the feared Hamas movement that has eclipsed even the followers of Abu Mazen in Gaza and seized the city of all the levers of administrative power and the forces of security. In this way, Sharon has led to a substantial division into two parts of any potential Palestinian state: the West Bank, ruled by the moderate Abbas firmly under Israeli control, Gaza, monstrous city of over one million inhabitants and the density of population highest in the world, free to cook in its broth of hunger, unemployment, close siege and blockade of all supplies that have been made also because of the regime Egypt's Mubarak.
In 2006 Sharon was knocked out by a stroke and has a vegetable, instead took over the Israeli government which is colorless Hehudi Olmert was careful not to change the policy of his predecessor and to initiate only pretend to the famous Road Map to peace. The settlements "colonies" in the West Bank have continued to multiply, to affect the area immediately adjacent to Gaza. The Hamas leader had pledged to refrain from hostile acts against Israeli territory for 6 months at least if the settlements were not included. Faced with their dumb Israeli militants began launching Qassam rockets almost harmless in the southern part Israeli territory, with a violence that in 6 months were able to cause 3 victims, 2 of nomadic Bedouins. Meanwhile, Olmert had wanted to flex his muscles trying to invade the southern part of Lebanon where, departed with much greater effectiveness of missile attacks and Hezbollah, the Iranian Shiite Lebanese movement thread, which inflicted a resounding defeat in spite of the Israeli army carpet bombing with which the planes with the Star of David half-destroyed several cities of Lebanon. To make up for the bad impression that Olmert has triggered a criminal attack on the Gaza Strip. The operation, called "Lead Time" has resulted in 1535 in the city and an unknown number of victims wounded, almost all amputees hit by shrapnel because of phosphorous bombs, banned by international conventions, dropped on the hapless city. The Israeli navy has imposed a total blockade, which prevents Palestinians from Gaza even get close to the sea for fishing. The living conditions are unimaginable in the city and called for international solidarity and humanitarian organizations in many countries. The small fleet destined to bring food aid to the exhausted population was intercepted in international waters by Israeli navy: a Turkish ship was boarded and the Israeli military have resulted in 11 deaths.
very latest: the election of Obama had hoped for a change U.S. policy on the Israeli Palestinian. The contrast with the election of Obama was the appointment of well-known Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu who has defiantly ignored the repeated calls by the U.S. government to suspend the settlements of Jewish settlements in the West Bank. Two days ago the Israeli government has started the construction of a complex of 290 apartments in the Arab part of Jerusalem, provoking the outraged reaction of the UN Secretary General. The Security Council emergency meeting, unanimously approved with one vote against an agenda that enjoined Israel to stop the project. Opposing vote with adjoining exercise of veto power, have expressed the U.S. representative to the United Nations. And the 86th over sixty years.
The servants of the Americans perform on their newspapers' oscillations of American policy in the Middle East. "
Europe will perform rituals in his aspirations to the need for parties to return to the negotiating table and perhaps will again propose the sending of observers, to prevent a renewed outbreak of violence is certain, however, that you resign to pay each increase in the price of oil. But there is a variation from the past, Arab countries will step forward to do what they have always done: proclamations, protests and substantial American acquiescence to Israeli policy. The entire Arab world is getting rid of despots corrupt sheiks and mockeries Reucci ready to every game. The people with a great past and a legacy of ancient civilizations sooner or later awaken and impose the reasons of history and then "In the name of God the Merciful and Clement will be justice!" and Israel can not expect much from its neighbors.
Saturday, February 19, 2011
Suitcase With Numeric Lock
THE ISRAELI PALESTINIAN CONFLICT - 7th part
coincide with what appeared to be the actual starting of the peace process, there was a dramatic recludescenza extremist Zionist groups more aggressively and, at least in terms of the same Likud propaganda. The walls of the Israeli towns, starting in Jerusalem were inundated with provocative posters depicting Rabin and Arafat together united by a Nazi swastika. In the eyes Zionist Rabin, who signed with Arafat's first attempt at peace between Israelis and Palestinians, based on the principle of safety in exchange for territories "and the recognition of Palestinian national authority by the state of Israel, during a massive anti-war demonstration was assassinated with three gunshot wounds in Tel Aviv November 4, 1995 by a young law student born in the United States and belonging to a small Jewish party of the ultra right. The killer, Yigal Amir, was able to approach the Israeli prime minister without anyone noticing, but after the shock and despair of the early days went to growing doubts about the true nature of the attack, which took on more and more the contours of a genuine own plot and not a mad act of an isolated young. During the investigation, doubts grew on the work of the Shin Bet security service. The investigation and statements by Amir, they emphasized that the bomber would be backed by a group of young hooligans, some elements of Mossad and even from one of Rabin's bodyguards. The morning had appeared in Tel Aviv a poster depicting Rabin under the word "Wanted." Leah, the widow of Yitzhak Rabin rejected their condolences to Sharon and Netanyahu, the Likud leader, and accused him bluntly of moral complicity of her husband despite the serious loss and the growing opposition to the violent Palestinian groups opposed to the continuation the peace process in early 1996 he held the first general elections in the territories handed over to the Palestinian Authority: Arafat was elected president and his party (Fatah) wins the most seats in the National Council of autonomy. The turnout was excellent despite the boycott against Abash and the Popular Front for Hawatmeh and a new movement of recent birth, destined to have large development in the course of time: it was an organization, Hamas, who was said to be supported by the Muslim Brotherhood and Iran Khomeini (but there are those who denounced the work under the table of Sharon, Hamas saw an element of extremism that could weaken Arafat). Also in 1996 in a climate of growing tension caused by the resumption of attacks against Israelis, there were new elections in Israel which were won by the Likud, whose leader Benjamin Netanyahu became prime minister. He allied himself with the extreme right, started in breach of the peace agreements the resumption of colonization in the occupied territories, imposed repeated delays in the agreed dates for the evacuation of troops and thus causing a sharp return of hostilities with the PLO and the entire Arab world.
The coalition government of right was soon weakened due to some defections and new elections were held in 1999, which led to the leadership of the country's Labour Minister Ehud Barak, who seemed willing to resume the process peace up to admit an explicit recognition of a Palestinian Arab state. The Barak government had a hard time for internal disputes and why the majority coalition failed peace talks with Arafat launched at the end of 2000 at Camp David (USA) with the mediation of U.S. President Clinton.
At first it seemed that everything proceeded for the best but the three protagonists of the talks were in some way as "lame ducks" Clinton was about to end his second term, Barak, admitted that he knew was in good faith at the outset that it would not never have accepted at least two of the demands that Arafat had given him, namely the return of the Arab part of Jerusalem and refugee return in the future Palestinian state, Arafat knew that, because of the corruption of many representatives of the PLO his party was severely weakened. On the other hand, while the negotiations took place in Jerusalem Ariel Sharon, defying every rule of fairness that no one had ever dared to break in, was produced with the protection of an impressive array of Israeli police in a provocative walk on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem. The anger that the irresponsible act, on the other carefully studied in view of the almost certain new Israeli elections, triggered the Palestinian population that gave rise to bloody events and the proclamation of a second "Intifada".
Barak resigned in early elections in February 2001 affirmed the right-wing coalition led by Sharon formed a national unity government with Labor and religious parties. In 2001/2002, a wave of unprecedented terrorist attacks hit Israel, where public opinion was shocked by the fact that the bombers were young, who were blown up along with their victims into hideous suicide bombings. Israel responded with heavy reprisals in the occupied territories, particularly in the West Bank, to confine Arafat was old and sick in his Ramallah headquarters. At the end of the terrible crash victims were counted in 320 Israeli civilians and nearly 4,000 deaths on the Palestinian side. Among the episodes in
which developed the tragic story stands out for its drama of what happened to the Church of the Nativity in Bethlehem, which had taken refuge in a hundred Palestinians, some of which are suspected of being terrorists were exiled at the end of a long negotiation, thanks to 'active intervention of Pope John Paul II, who bluntly accused Israel of imposing on the Palestinian people with a painful and unjust ordeal.
coincide with what appeared to be the actual starting of the peace process, there was a dramatic recludescenza extremist Zionist groups more aggressively and, at least in terms of the same Likud propaganda. The walls of the Israeli towns, starting in Jerusalem were inundated with provocative posters depicting Rabin and Arafat together united by a Nazi swastika. In the eyes Zionist Rabin, who signed with Arafat's first attempt at peace between Israelis and Palestinians, based on the principle of safety in exchange for territories "and the recognition of Palestinian national authority by the state of Israel, during a massive anti-war demonstration was assassinated with three gunshot wounds in Tel Aviv November 4, 1995 by a young law student born in the United States and belonging to a small Jewish party of the ultra right. The killer, Yigal Amir, was able to approach the Israeli prime minister without anyone noticing, but after the shock and despair of the early days went to growing doubts about the true nature of the attack, which took on more and more the contours of a genuine own plot and not a mad act of an isolated young. During the investigation, doubts grew on the work of the Shin Bet security service. The investigation and statements by Amir, they emphasized that the bomber would be backed by a group of young hooligans, some elements of Mossad and even from one of Rabin's bodyguards. The morning had appeared in Tel Aviv a poster depicting Rabin under the word "Wanted." Leah, the widow of Yitzhak Rabin rejected their condolences to Sharon and Netanyahu, the Likud leader, and accused him bluntly of moral complicity of her husband despite the serious loss and the growing opposition to the violent Palestinian groups opposed to the continuation the peace process in early 1996 he held the first general elections in the territories handed over to the Palestinian Authority: Arafat was elected president and his party (Fatah) wins the most seats in the National Council of autonomy. The turnout was excellent despite the boycott against Abash and the Popular Front for Hawatmeh and a new movement of recent birth, destined to have large development in the course of time: it was an organization, Hamas, who was said to be supported by the Muslim Brotherhood and Iran Khomeini (but there are those who denounced the work under the table of Sharon, Hamas saw an element of extremism that could weaken Arafat). Also in 1996 in a climate of growing tension caused by the resumption of attacks against Israelis, there were new elections in Israel which were won by the Likud, whose leader Benjamin Netanyahu became prime minister. He allied himself with the extreme right, started in breach of the peace agreements the resumption of colonization in the occupied territories, imposed repeated delays in the agreed dates for the evacuation of troops and thus causing a sharp return of hostilities with the PLO and the entire Arab world.
The coalition government of right was soon weakened due to some defections and new elections were held in 1999, which led to the leadership of the country's Labour Minister Ehud Barak, who seemed willing to resume the process peace up to admit an explicit recognition of a Palestinian Arab state. The Barak government had a hard time for internal disputes and why the majority coalition failed peace talks with Arafat launched at the end of 2000 at Camp David (USA) with the mediation of U.S. President Clinton.
At first it seemed that everything proceeded for the best but the three protagonists of the talks were in some way as "lame ducks" Clinton was about to end his second term, Barak, admitted that he knew was in good faith at the outset that it would not never have accepted at least two of the demands that Arafat had given him, namely the return of the Arab part of Jerusalem and refugee return in the future Palestinian state, Arafat knew that, because of the corruption of many representatives of the PLO his party was severely weakened. On the other hand, while the negotiations took place in Jerusalem Ariel Sharon, defying every rule of fairness that no one had ever dared to break in, was produced with the protection of an impressive array of Israeli police in a provocative walk on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem. The anger that the irresponsible act, on the other carefully studied in view of the almost certain new Israeli elections, triggered the Palestinian population that gave rise to bloody events and the proclamation of a second "Intifada".
Barak resigned in early elections in February 2001 affirmed the right-wing coalition led by Sharon formed a national unity government with Labor and religious parties. In 2001/2002, a wave of unprecedented terrorist attacks hit Israel, where public opinion was shocked by the fact that the bombers were young, who were blown up along with their victims into hideous suicide bombings. Israel responded with heavy reprisals in the occupied territories, particularly in the West Bank, to confine Arafat was old and sick in his Ramallah headquarters. At the end of the terrible crash victims were counted in 320 Israeli civilians and nearly 4,000 deaths on the Palestinian side. Among the episodes in
which developed the tragic story stands out for its drama of what happened to the Church of the Nativity in Bethlehem, which had taken refuge in a hundred Palestinians, some of which are suspected of being terrorists were exiled at the end of a long negotiation, thanks to 'active intervention of Pope John Paul II, who bluntly accused Israel of imposing on the Palestinian people with a painful and unjust ordeal.
The elections of January 2003 saw the victory of the Likud led by Sharon, Labor's defeat and the success of a new line-oriented secular Shinui that while the religious parties were not opposed to the less intransigent towards the Arabs . Sharon was given the task of forming a new government and in February the same year he presented to the Knesset, a coalition of the Likud, Shinui and the party from nazionalreligioso, a small extremist group that represented the "settlers." 
To counter the terrorist attacks of suicide bombers, the Israeli government responded by ordering the construction of a high wall that, in addition to encircle the Palestinian territories took advantage of Israel's borders in order to incorporate more new lands. During the same year, however, resumed the attempts by the international community to achieve a resolution of the conflict between Israelis and Palestinians, partly because the Sept. 11, 2001 was the tragic attack on the Twin Towers in New York and the Pentagon by a group of Saudi terrorists, is affiliated with an organization, Al-Qaida, led by Sheikh Osama Bin-Laden. The new American government, led by George W. Bush was in urgent need to isolate the Israeli-Palestinian conflict from anything that could provide space and grounds to the front facing new enemy on the horizon and in this context was presented a new peace plan called the "Road Map", drawn not only from the USA, European Union, Russia and the United Nations, which was entrusted to the discussion between the Palestinians and Israelis. The facts were soon proved that it was unsuccessful in the presence of a new illusion: now, as he comments an Israeli writer, Israelis and Palestinians were like two scorpions in a bottle closed.
To counter the terrorist attacks of suicide bombers, the Israeli government responded by ordering the construction of a high wall that, in addition to encircle the Palestinian territories took advantage of Israel's borders in order to incorporate more new lands. During the same year, however, resumed the attempts by the international community to achieve a resolution of the conflict between Israelis and Palestinians, partly because the Sept. 11, 2001 was the tragic attack on the Twin Towers in New York and the Pentagon by a group of Saudi terrorists, is affiliated with an organization, Al-Qaida, led by Sheikh Osama Bin-Laden. The new American government, led by George W. Bush was in urgent need to isolate the Israeli-Palestinian conflict from anything that could provide space and grounds to the front facing new enemy on the horizon and in this context was presented a new peace plan called the "Road Map", drawn not only from the USA, European Union, Russia and the United Nations, which was entrusted to the discussion between the Palestinians and Israelis. The facts were soon proved that it was unsuccessful in the presence of a new illusion: now, as he comments an Israeli writer, Israelis and Palestinians were like two scorpions in a bottle closed. Wednesday, February 2, 2011
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)